|
|
|||||
![]()
|
Edward Capell
Edward Capell was known as an eccentric figure among editors of Shakespeare, an eccentricity that extends to the publication history of his edition of the works. He was obsessive in his personal habits. According to Samuel Pegge "...to remove and misplace the most trifling thing in his room was a heinous offence" ("Brief Memoirs of Edward Capell, Esq.", by Samuel Pegge, Esq., in John Nichols, Illustrations of the Literary History of the Eighteenth Century, vol. I, 1817, p. 475). By the good offices of the Duke of Grafton he was appointed Deputy Inspector of Plays in 1737, a position that earned him 200£ per year. He later inherited the substantial income from his father of 1300£ per year which allowed him the liberty of pursuing his edition of Shakespeare's plays, which he labored over for many years. He brought it forth in 1767-68 in octavo, without notes, returning to the style of Rowe. It was, in fact, annotated, but the notes did not appear until much later. The first volume of notes on nine plays with a glossary appeared in 1774, "...but the sales were so poor that Capell withdrew the book from circulation..." (Murphy, Shakespeare in Print, p. 85). In 1779 he published two volumes of his notes by subscription but again, sales were disappointing. In 1783 the final volume of notes was published, the work being completed by John Collins, for Capell had died in 1781. Capell's notes are titled Notes and Various Readings of Shakespeare, the final volume of which is titled The School of Shakespeare, but I have been unable to locate an edition on the Internet. Edward Capell was born at Troston, near
Bury, in Suffolk, England, June 11, 1713. He was
educated at a school in St. Edmund's Bury. His father
was a clergyman, and both this gentleman and
Capell's grandfather were friends of the Duke of
Grafton. The details concerning his life which have
been preserved are very meagre, and not very
trustworthy, but he appears to have finished his
education at college, though it is not known which one
he attended. He knew David Garrick quite well at one
time, but afterwards quarrelled with him. He read law,
and was called to the bar. Through the influence of
the Duke of Grafton he was subsequently appointed Deputy
Inspector of Plays, an office which was created by Act
of Parliament in 1736, having for its object the
inspection and license of all dramatic compositions
before they were allowed to be acted. This position
brought him £200 per annum, and, together with the post
of Groom of the Privy Chamber (which he also held
through his friendship with the Duke of Grafton, who was
Lord Chamberlain from 1742 to 1757,) made his income
from official sources about £300. His father was a
younger brother, and subsequently was heir to his elder
brother, whereby he became the possessor of a
considerable estate, which descended to Edward Capell.
The latter built a house at Hastings which cost him
£5000, although when it was sold after his death it only
realized £1300. Here he lived from May until October of
every year. He had few friends and passed his time in
study. It is related of him that on one occasion when a
friend called to see him he requested him to leave his
cane in the vestibule for fear of its soiling the
carpets! No one dared to stir his fire, snuff his
candles, or move the smallest thing in his rooms on pain
of his displeasure. While in London he lived in Essex
Court, and his first published work seems to have been
an edition of Antony and Cleopatra which appeared
in 1758, in 16mo. The title-page is as follows: "Antony
and Cleopatra; an historical Play, written by William
Shakespeare: fitted for the Stage by abridging only; and
now acted, at the Theatre-Royal in Drury-Lane, by his
Majesty's Servants. No grave upon the earth shall clip
in it a pair so famous: p. 99. London: Printed for J.
and R. Tonson in the Strand. MDCLVIII."[?] In
appearance it much resembles Capell's edition of the
poet's works, and it has been erroneously supposed that
it was published as a specimen of that edition. This is
a mistake however, as it is merely an abridgment of the
play for acting purposes. David Garrick supplied the
abridgment, and Capell edited the text, though neither
of their names are on the title-page, or in fact in any
part of the book. There is a poetical dedication signed
"Ignoto," and a list of conjectural readings. Two
years afterwards he published in 16 mo: "Prolusions;
or, select Pieces of antient Poetry; —compil'd with
great Care from their several Originals, and offer'd to
the Publick as Specimens of the Integrity that should be
found in the Editions of worthy Authors, —in three
Parts; containing, I. The notbrowne Mayde; Master
Sacksville's Induction; and, Overbury's Wife : II.
Edward the third, a Play, thought to be writ by
Shakespeare: III. Those excellent didactic Poems,
intitl'd—Nosce teipsum, written by Sir John Davis: with
a Preface. Impius haec tam culta novalia miles habebat?
Barbarus has fegetes ? Virg. Ecl. I. London: Printed for
J. and R. Tonson in the Strand. 1760." Both in this work
and in his edition of Antony and Cleopatra, above
referred to, Capell displayed his love for well-printed
books, which was afterwards confirmed by his edition of
Shakespeare. In typographical appearance they are models
of neatness, and the paper on which they were printed is
of excellent quality for the time when they appeared. At
the end of each he gives a list of the editions he
consulted in their preparation, and lists of various and
conjectural readings. Capell accumulated a very
valuable library, containing many of the Quarto editions
of Shakespeare, which are now literally worth far more
than their weight in gold, besides many works of old
English literature which he made excellent use of, and
which will be referred to further on. His books and MSS.
were left by his will to Trinity College, England, and
form part of that valuable collection, which afforded
such great help to the editors of the Cambridge edition
of Shakespeare. He died January 24, 1781, and was
buried at Farnham, All Saints, Suffolk. As far back as
1745 he commended the preparation of his edition of
Shakespeare, and it is related of him that he copied all
of the poet's plays in his own handwriting no less than
ten times! In September, 1760, Volume II of his
edition was sent to press, and was followed by Volumes
VIII, IV, IX, I, VI, and VII, in the order given; and
the latter volume was completed in August, 1765. It is
not known when Volumes I, III, and V were printed, as
none of these volumes are dated, and Capell only
mentions the time that the former ones were printed. At
the end of volume X, however, the date 1768 is given. It
will be noticed that this singular man, who apparently
could do nothing in the same manner as other people,
followed no system in the sequence of the printing of
his volumes: for certainly the usual manner would have
been to have had Volume III printed after Volume II, and
to have followed regularly to the end. As before stated,
none of the title pages of the volumes bear any date,
but it is believed that the whole work was published
during 1767 and 1768, and Capell received three hundred
pounds for it. The book appeared in ten volumes
duodecimo, very neatly printed on paper that was good
for that day. The first title-page of Volume I is as
follows : "Mr William Shakespeare his Comedies,
Histories, and Tragedies, set out by himself in quarto,
or by his Players, his Fellows in folio, and now
faithfully republish'd from those Editions in ten
Volumes octavo ; with an Introduction: Whereunto will be
added, in some other Volumes, Notes, critical and
explanatory, and a Body of Various Readings entire. Qui
genus humanum ingenio superavit, et omnies Proestinxit,
stellas exortus uti aethereus Sol. Lucr. Lib. 3. 1.
1056. London: Printed by Dryden Leach, for J. and R.
Tonson in the Strand." There is also a second title page
in Volume I, after the introductory matter which reads
thus: "The Works of Shakespeare, Volume the first;
containing The Tempest, The two Gentlemen of
Verona, The merry Wives of Windsor. London :
Printed for J. and R. Tonson in the Strand." Similar
title pages, with the names of the plays that are
contained in each volume, are in all of them, but only
in the first volume does the title page first given
above appear.
The "wretched
vignette" referred to by Norris. There is no portrait in the usual place opposite the
title page, Capell could not do anything so like
ordinary mortals' practice, so he relegated the poet's
picture to the end of the Introduction, p. 74, where
there is given a wretched vignette copy of the Chandos
portrait, by I. Miller. The work is dedicated to the
Duke of Grafton, and the dedication is dated "Essex
Court, in the Temple, Nov. 9, 1767," and signed "Edward
Capell." Nowhere else does his name appear in the book.
The introduction follows, and consists of seventy-four
closely printed pages. In this Capell first discusses
the Quarto editions, their merits and defects, the First
Folio, and the editors who preceded him : Rowe, Pope,
Theobald, Hanmer, Warburton and Dr. Johnson. Capell
discriminates well between those Quartos which " have
much resemblance to those in the folio" and those which
were "first drafts or else imperfect and stolen copies."
He says:—
Let it then be granted, that these quarto's are
the Poet's own copies, however they were come by;
hastily written first, and issuing from presses most
of them as corrupt and licentious as can any where
be produc'd, and not overseen by himself, nor by any
of his friends: And there can be no stronger reason
for subscribing to any opinion, than may be drawn in
favour of this from the condition of all the other
plays that were first printed in the folio : for, in
method of publication, they have the greatest
likeness possible to those which preceded them, and
carry all the same marks of haste and negligence;
yet the genuineness of the latter is attested by
those who publish'd them, and no proof brought to
invalidate their testimony. If it be still ask'd,
what then becomes of the accusation brought against
the quarto's by the player editors, the answer is
not so far off as may perhaps be expected: It may be
true that they were 'stolen;' but stolen from the
Author's copies, by transcribers who found means to
get at them : and, 'maim'd' they must needs be, in
respect of their many alterations after the first
performance : And who knows, if the difference that
is betwen them, in some of the plays that are common
to them both, has not been studiously heighten'd by
the player editors,—who had the means in their
power, being masters of all the alterations—to give
at once a greater currency to their own lame
edition, and support the charge which they bring
against the quarto's? this, at least, is a probable
opinion, and no bad way of accounting for those
differences. The above passage is printed verbatim from
Capell's "Introduction," and is a fair specimen of his
style and punctuation at its best. It was turgid in the
extreme, and it is often necessary to read his sentences
two or three times to fully understand what he means.
Dr. Johnson said of him: "If the man would have come to
me, I would have endeavoured to endow his purposes with
words, for as it is he doth gabble monstrously." W. N.
Lettsom says: "His style may be. fairly described by
parodying Johnson's panegyric on Addison. Whoever wishes
to attain an English style uncouth without simplicity,
obscure without conciseness, and slovenly without ease,
must give his nights and days to the Notes of Capell."
With all his defects of style, however, Capell had a
better idea of the proper duties of an editor of
Shakespeare's text than any of his predecessors. After
referring to the license of those who had already
published editions of the poet, he says : Which when he had perus'd with no little
astonishment, and consider'd the fatal consequences
that must inevitably follow the imitation of so much
license, he resolv'd himself to be the champion; and
to exert to the uttermost such abilities as he was
master of, to save from ruin an edifice of this
dignity, which England must forever glory in.
Hereupon he posse'd himself of the other modern
editions, the folio's, and as many quarto's as could
presently be procur'd; and, within a few years
after, fortune and industry help'd him to all the
rest, six only excepted; adding to them withal
twelve more, which the compilers of former tables
had no knowledge of. Thus furnish'd, he fell
immediately to collation,—which is the first step in
works of this nature ; and without it nothing is
done to purpose,— first of moderns with moderns,
then of moderns with ancients, and afterwards of
ancients with others more ancient : 'till, at the
last, a ray of light broke forth upon him, by which
he hop'd to find his way through the wilderness of
these editions into that fair country the Poet's
real habitation. He had not proceeded far in his
collation, before he saw cause to come to this
resolution; —to Stick invariably to the old
editions, (that is, the best of them) which hold now
the place of manuscripts, no scrap of the Author's
writing having the luck to come down to us; and
never to depart from them, but in cases where
reason, and the uniform practice of men of the
greatest note in this art, tell him—they may be
quitted; nor yet in those, without notice. He further tells us that it was his original
intention to have given the names of the authors of the
emendations he adopted in his text on the same page, but
he changed his mind as to this and did not do so,
principally because "their number, in some passages
makes them a little unsightly ; and the editor professes
himself weak enough to like a well-printed book." He
does, however, give some various readings at the bottom
of the page. His own emendations, which he printed in
his text, are in black letter to distinguish them. At
the end of his introduction he gives the origin of the
plots of the plays ; and following these are printed
several commendatory poems. Then comes a list of the
Quarto editions used by him, which is wonderfully
complete, only a few being wanting. This is followed by
a list of plays ascribed to Shakespeare, a list of the
Folios, and of editions of the poems. Each play has a
separate pagination, and they are arranged in the order
of the First Folio. Capell used many curious marks of
punctuation. In the preface to his Prolusions,
above referred to, he gives an explanation of them.
Those passages which are ironical he marked with an
inverted period. The dash he used in a new form. When it
was on a line with the top of letters it had its usual
meaning, but when it was at the bottom it pointed out
that the speech passed from one person to another, and
denoted a change of address. He put it where the change
began, and where it ended. A dagger with two crosses
meant that the speaker pointed to, or delivered some
object, double inverted commas denoted that the speech
was an "aside." Capell's text was the purest that had
then appeared, because he founded it on a careful
collation of the old copies. He gave the place of each
scene more minutely than Pope, and added to the stage
directions. Throughout the volumes, at the bottom of the
pages, will often be found the words "v. Note."
Reference is intended to his Notes and Various
Readings of Shakespeare, published in three volumes
quarto, in 1779, 1780 and 1781. This work was published
in part in 1774, during the author's lifetime, but only
a few copies were sold, and the book was withdrawn, to
be published later with the other volumes as above
stated. Capell by his will directed that the expense of
printing them should be borne by his estate, and they
appeared after his death. They contain a wealth of
illustration of the poet's works, which has been freely
used by subsequent editors without giving Capell the
credit which was his due. Volume I. contains a
Glossary, excellent for its day; and is followed by
Notes and Various Readings. These refer to the volume
and page of his edition containing the play commented
on, and are written in the same turgid style as the
Introduction to his Shakespeare. They are printed
in parallel columns, and the words are divided wherever
the printer came to the end of a line, without the least
regard to syllables. The same thing had been done in the
Introduction to his edition, but there the type is
smaller and the lines longer, and hence it is not as
frequent or as exasperating. O-thers, o-dious,
apothe-gms, thr-ough, be-auty, pr-oceed, gr-ound,
pl-ease, sou-rce, opi-nion, strang-ers, are a few of
these curious divisions, of which, Dr. Furness aptly
remarks, " it is really humiliating, after the drollery
has worn off, to find how serious is the annoyance which
so trifling a matter can create." "And yet," to quote
still further Dr. Furness' opinion of these notes "in
spite of all this, Capell's notes are worthy of all
respect. He had good sense, and his opinions (when we
can make them out) are never to be lightly discarded."
The notes are divided into "parts," and at the end of
each part are given very complete lists of various
readings. Had Capell given these at the bottom of the
pages of his edition of the poet, he would have added
greatly to its value, and would have been entitled to
the honor which fell to Jennens, who first adopted this
plan. After his notes on the plays, Capell prints a
very brief note on their order ; and an essay on the
verse, which is very elaborate. Volume III is entitled
"The School of Shakespeare," and contains extracts from
books in print during the poet's time, and illustrating
the source of the plots of his plays. Extracts are given
also from other books which "contribute to a due
Understanding of his Writings, or give Light to the
History of his Life, or to the dramatic history of his
Time," to use the quaint phraseology of its title-page.
This volume showed the way to the editors who came after
Capell, by which they profited, and drew from the books
he called attention to, much of the most valuable
illustration of the part to be found in their editions.
It is safe to say that this is the most valuable volume
of commentary which had been up to that time published
in illustration of Shakespeare. Capell has reared a
monument in this volume to his learning and knowledge of
Elizabethan literature which will never perish.
Unfortunately the work is now rare, and seldom met with.
Poor Capell went to his grave unappreciated by men of
his day, but later generations have made amends for the
neglect of his contemporaries. Dr. J. 0. Halliwell-Phillips,
who has himself done more than any living man to
illustrate the poet he loves so well, dedicated his
great folio edition of Shakespeare to Capell, in these
words : "I venture, with all humility, to dedicate this
work to the memory of the ablest and the most neglected
of Shakespearian critics —Edward Capell." And, in
imitation of the queer, though learned man he was
honoring, Dr. Halliwell-Phillips printed his dedication
at the end of the last volume of his edition. Capell
did not give the Poems in his edition, and it is very
singular that he omitted them. He had the example of all
those editors who had gone before him however. In 1775
an edition of them, founded on that of 1640, was
published. It is printed very much in the same style of
Capell's Shakespeare, and is often found with it. The
title-page reads. " Poems written by Mr. William
Shakespeare. Reprinted for Thomas Evans, No. 50, Strand,
near York Building." An engraving of the Chandos
portrait, by A. Bannerman, is in the centre. It is not
known who edited this book, but it has been attributed
to Capell. This however is probably an error, for had he
been the editor, he would, in all probability, have used
the edition of 1609, which is far preferable to that of
1640. J. PARKER NORRIS. Brief Memoirs of Edward Capell, Esq. by the late Samuel Pegge, Esq. F.S.A.
BRIEF
MEMOIRS of EDWARD CAPELL, Esq. The Writer of the following Minutes, for he is not master of regular biographical information, was led to them by the very transient and disrespectful mention that is made of Mr. Capell in the " Biographia Dramatica (Second Edition, 1782)." The cold manner in which he is there treated as an Editor of Shakespeare ; the small credit given to his erudition ; and the suggestion that he was in circumstances merely above want, by virtue of the post of Deputy Inspector of the Plays, are insinuations which seem to have been designedly brought forward to depress him in the opinion of the world. The Editor, it is plain, thought Mr. Capell was living when he wrote the ill-natured account of him published in 1782, though (in his Additions and Corrections) he chose to find out that he had died in 1781. I do not lay this account to the charge of the Compiler of the " Biographia Dramatica;" but rather consider it as a guiltless subornation, and that the Memoir was dictated by a party inimical to Mr. Capell—"Delenda est Carthgo."—But, before we comment, let us see the text. The short Memoir in the " Biographia Dramatica" runs in these words:
Mr. Capell was born at Troston, near Bury, in Suffolk, June 11, 1713. He was descended from the Capells of that County, but from what branch of them the Writer cannot say with precision, though it became collateral before the family was ennobled, and therefore was not in the entail of its honours, as some have imagined. This has been acknowledged by Mr. Capell, for an affectation of this kind of pride was not among his foibles. The Father of the gentleman before us was a Clergyman, and held the family living hereafter mentioned ; and, I presume, was a younger brother, and became heir to his elder brother, for he enjoyed a considerable patrimonial estate, which afterwards devolved to Edward his eldest son ; while the living, with a younger brother's fortune, went to Robert the younger and only brother of Edward. Edward had one brother, Robert ; and three sisters, Hester, Dorothy, and Anne. He had an uncle of the name of Maddox, who was a Clerk in the Lord Chamberlain's office under Charles Duke of Grafton. This was probably on the mother's side. Edward was, I think, of Catherine Hall, though he left his MSS. and Books relative to Shakespeare to Trinity College. His brother was a Fellow (a Senior) at the time: but that was not the reason of such bequest. The former College was, in his opinion, too obscure a place for such a deposit ; for nothing but his industry could exceed his vanity. More than twenty years of his life were spent in preparing the Text of Shakespeare for the press. He must at the same time have attended to his Notes, Glossary, and the "School of Shakespeare," which he did not live to publish ; though not more than two or three sheets were left unprinted; so that, in fact, 33 years of his life were absorbed in these Works : for he did little else ; though he preserved the languages in a more or less degree to the last. He was no mean classical scholar, and to the dead languages had added the French and the Italian ; the last of which was necessary to him in his post of Deputy Inspector of the Plays, including the Operas, which were sent to him untranslated. The offices of Inspector and Deputy Inspector of the Plays, &c. were erected in consequence of an Act of Parliament, 1737, which allows no Plays to be performed without the license of the Lord Chamberlain. In the first of these posts William Chetwynd, Esq. was placed ; and in the second Edward Capell, Esq. both presented by the Duke of Grafton, Lord Chamberlain, in whose patronage they were. On the decease of Mr. Capell, the Earl of Hertford, then Lord Chamberlain, conferred the post on James Trail, Esq. ; though in the year 1782 it was abolished, in the general reform that took place in consequence of Mr. Burke's Bill. Mr. Capell held likewise, under the Lord Chamberlain, the place of a Groom of the Privy Chamber, in which he was likewise put by his Grace of Grafton, 1745, vice John Parsons, Esq. and in which also he was succeeded by Mr. Trail. The nett produce of these two appointments was, communibus annis, very nearly worth £300. It was to these two appointments that Mr. Capell alludes in the Dedication of his Edition of Shakespeare's Plays, wherein he tells Augustus-Henry, then Duke of Grafton, that — "Your illustrious Grandfather vouchsafed to call mine his friend, and always spoke of him with pleasure : he honoured me early with his patronage, and to him I owe the leisure that has enabled me to bestow upon this Work the attention of twenty years."—It may be asked, what was Mr. Capell's Vocation from which the Duke's favour withdrew his attention? I answer, the Bar, to which he had been called, I presume, with a view to the practice of the profession of the Law. These appointments, added to his patrimonial estate, or at least his expectations, gave him that otium cum dignitate which enabled him to pursue the bent of his inclination. No one can judge of his abilities as an Advocate, though I should not suspect they were considerable ; so that his Grace of Grafton was not only his Patron, but, perhaps, his best Client. It cannot be allowed that Mr. Capell had any genius, by which I mean wit or invention ; for nothing original is known to have been written by him. Once indeed he shewed to a friend a bald, ill-written, and unpointed Epigram, leveled at his persecutors, which he himself chuckled at as a happy thought. Neither had he any tincture of what is called taste. He had not even pretensions to the intermediate rank of an Antiquary (for he held them rather in contempt), though he of necessity met with so many passages in Shakespeare relative to ancient customs and manners. These he seems to have overlooked in search of various readings, for which I need but refer to his Notes, wherein he is much more busy in comparing Editions than in elucidating his Author. He is so far rather a Commentator on the old Editors than on the Poet himself ; a task hardly worth the pains of a German Grammarian, considering how loosely Shakespeare has been printed in the first impressions. Dr. Zachary Grey gives into it a little ; but Mr. Capell, it must be confessed, adheres to it in the most frivolous instances. The Poet wrote with so little regard to posthumous fame, that even the first Quarto publication, which appeared in his life-time, one would think (from the careless manner it seems to have been edited) hardly underwent his own correction, at least with any tolerable degree of attention. Had it been otherwise, subsequent copies could scarcely have suffered so much mutilation, and called forth so many Commentators. The Second Edition (the first Folios as they are called) were, no doubt, mangled by the fanciful wantonness, or ignorance, of the Publishers. Thus much for Mr. Capell's Notes : —but as to the Text, I confess to think it as faithfully given, if not more so, than by any of his antecessors, or contemporaries. The passages which he has restored, by transposition of words, lines, and even speeches (though I think he has overlooked some that still want it) have rendered the Author more intelligible, and his own Edition most eligible to read, by those at least who would wish to see the Poet in his native dress. He piqued himself, and not without some justice, in having purged and reclaimed his Author's Text ; insomuch that, being complimented with the title of the Restorer of Shakespeare by a Literary Peer (I think Lord Dacre) he was known to have wept whenever he read the Letter. His vanity, it mast be allowed, was a little aided in this weakness by the irritable state of his nerves, occasioned by a sedentary and secluded life. This appellation was the maximum of his wishes ; —the misfortune was, that it was said in a private Letter, and not to the world, with which he was undesignedly at war. I do not know that ever he wrote any thing to draw down the indignation of the world upon him : but his contemporary Editors are represented as inimical to him, and as having thrown out insinuations to his prejudice, though he was a harmless Editor of Shakespeare, who religiously prayed to die in the service, at the hazard of his literary salvation. Certain it is he sought no profit ; for Tonson's property in the Author prevented it, and the expence rested solely on Mr. Capell.
Mr. Capell's style, it cannot but be confessed, is
turgid to a great degree ; and every trait of him, be it
found where it may, betrays a fondness for singularity,
which prevailed over him in every thing. His
Introduction to the Dramas of Shakespeare is a sample of
his manner of writing : the very type of the Work is
pedantic, by his avoiding the compound letters where he
can : and, I believe, the paper was made on purpose,
without the wire-mark. His Notes, &c. being printed in
columns, has frequently obliged the compositor to divide
monosyllables contrary to all rule, which had been
avoided by long lines : —but this would have been doing
like other people. When asked why he did not print the
Notes under the Text, he urged deformity of his page,
and thought it was more agreeable and convenient to read
the text in one book, and the notes in another. That is
as every one shall judge for himself but how is it to be
done in the case of the Work before us ;—while the pure
text came out 1768 ; —the Notes to Nine Plays, together
with the Glossary, not till 1774 ;—and the rest of the
Notes, with the "School of Shakespeare," in 1783. Here,
according to Mr. Capell's idea, is an interval of
fifteen years before the Text and the Notes can be read
in concert. This first volume, if I mistake not, he sold to Messrs. Edward and Charles Dilly, in the Poultry, his publishers : and the fate of it shews the Author's disinterestedness ; for, on finding it had little or no sale, he re-called the impression, as far as he could, and repaid the balance of what had been the original consideration for the unsold copies ; reserving this first volume for a re-publication with the other two, a circumstance attended with an immediate loss of some hundred pounds.—Mr. Capell was then advised to reprint the three volumes by a moderate subscription, which was entered into, and Proposals were further insinuated among the friends to whom he was known, and by whom he was patronized, without his name appearing. The subscription was three guineas for the whole, with a deposit of one guinea, which was lodged with a banker till, by publication, the whole became demandable. This event he did not live to see accomplished, and thereby perhaps avoided still greater mortification than he before experienced. The subscription was respectable, though not numerous. This, however, he did not regret so much as the inattention of a Friend (not to be mentioned) who had given him the most flattering hopes, through his personal interest, of a long list of names, which eventually amounted to very few. This, I say, did not weigh with Mr. Capell, so much as the Work not appearing so soon as he expected, for want of a competent number of names ; and, I doubt not, embittered some of his latter hours : for, had the subscription equalled the pride of his expectations, he has been heard to say, that, at all events, "he was prepared to lose several hundred pounds by the publication." His attachment to the Work was so great, that, as appears by his Will, he charged his personal estate with any and every expence that might attend the publication after his decease. As he had received subscriptions in part, his honour now came in aid of his vanity ; which, it must be said, was of superior consideration, great as the latter might be. Mr. Capell was a personable, well-made man, of the middle stature, and had much of the carriage, manners, and sentiments of a gentleman. The Bust prefixed to his Notes and the "School of Shakespeare," was taken, I presume, when he was in the meridian of health; for it conveys nothing of his features in profile to those who only knew him in the latter part of his life, when he was much afflicted with a scorbutic humour, which shewed itself so much in his face, that his features became coarse, swoln, and disguised. When he was a young man, both at College and at the Temple, he was a professed beau, and much inclined to gallantry, as well as gaiety in dress. He "knew where the bona-robas were ;" and his constitution, from the nature of those infirmities which carried him off, suffered ultimately by these inamoratas. These circumstances he has been heard to declare to his intimates, in those few moments when he gave way to freedom of conversation, and openness of heart. During the time that he was so immersed in Shakespeare, he secluded himself in great measure from the world, admitting very few people to an audience, and these were such as could talk about Shakespeare themselves, or had patience to hear him on the subject :—but he that strenuously opposed his opinions was forbid the court. If you had sufficient address to hear him prose about various readings, transpositions of passages, &c. you might preserve yourself tolerably well in his graces : —but it was labour and sorrow, for he was all over Shakespeare. He used to frequent the evening conversazione at the Bishop of Lincoln's (Green)—and afterwards at Dr. Heberden's ; but it is said that the share he took in them was not the most agreeable, from his being too opiniatre and dictatorial. When he left off attending these Attic evenings, he became almost an anchorite. There was once much intercourse between him and Mr. Garrick ; for I may not call it intimacy, as two men of such predominant vanities could never coalesce for any long time. When they happened to flatter each other, they accorded tolerably well ; but the least slight on either side put things out of tune. He has been heard to say, when Mr. Garrick was not in favour, "that he spoke many speeches in Shakespeare without understanding them :"—meaning, I presume, not according to his (Mr. Capell's) text. There was once a moment, but from what degree of duplicity on the part of Mr. Garrick I know not, when Mr. Capell cautioned a friend, in the manner of Pontius Pilate's Wife, "never to have any thing to do with David Garrick ; for, depend upon it, he will deceive you." This was at the close of Mr. Capell's life, when he was, as it were, determined to have the last blow, and when his peevishness, and dissatisfactions, perchance, at feeling himself of no consequence, entirely had soured a disposition that was naturally upon the fret, and easily fermented. It is matter of no surprise that one who had affected so much refinement should fancy himself a man of taste. Painting, and Musick, I think, he-was equally a stranger to ; he might, for the sake of Shakespeare, like Poetry ; though he was not perhaps, generally speaking, a competent judge. As he must shew a taste in something, he chose Architecture, and built a house on the faith of his own skill in that Science, for which he paid exceedingly dear, to the great disappointment of those who succeeded to his fortune. This house was placed in a situation of all others the most uninteresting to a man of taste, who looks for diversity of prospect, lawns, groves, rivulets, &c. ; for it was close to the sea, at the dirty Port of Hastings. Here was he so much cramped in the scope about his house, that he was obliged to hire several adjacencies, or pay for them "inch-meal." This whim cost him by his own account, and he was not given to exaggeration, near £5000—and, lamentable to tell ! did not after his decease produce much more than £1300. Here, for the last twenty years of his life, he passed his hours from May till October, equally unknowing and unknown, for he was of too haughty a spirit to associate with the inhabitants, and too much an humourist to be sought for by the neighbouring gentry. At first indeed he used to make morning visits to the Earl of Ashburnham and the Bishop of Chichester (Sir William Ashburnham, who had a patrimonial seat in the neighbourhood) ; but even these wore away, and he became at last as much a Hermit at Hastings as in his Chambers in the Temple.
When he came to town in October, for the ten years
preceding his death, nothing but the most urgent
business could draw him out of doors. He was, however,
exceedingly temperate in his diet, eating sparingly of
simple things, and chiefly white-meats, and drinking no
wine, except one glass if perchance any one was allowed
to partake of his little repast. He was prudent, not
covetous ; —expensive he could not be, though he was
always neat in his dress to the last, which was as plain
and simple as it had once been gaudy. Having never seen
his house at Hastings, I am entitled to say little of
it, but that it is now a lodging-house; a circumstance
which could he have foreseen, he would, no doubt, have
pulled it down, and not left one stone upon another. The
spirit of nicety and refinement, however, prevailed in
it so much during his life-time, that when a Friend (a
Baronet) called upon him in a tour, he was desired to
leave his cane in the vestibule, lest he should either
dirt the floors with it, or soil the carpet. No one but
himself was permitted to stir his fire, or snuff his
candles ; and to remove and misplace the most trifling
thing in his room was a heinous offence. Thus, while he
mistook literary industry for genius, he thought
preciseness was a proof of a refined understanding ; —long habit had changed the latter into a humoursome
particularity and peevishness, which drove his friends
from even making him elemosinary visits when he really
wished and begged for a little company. He died Jan. 24,
1781, aet. 68.
Links to Capell's Edition of 1767-1768
|
|
|
|